Context

Buyers worry about IP leakage more than price. If the supplier cannot show controls, sensitive geometry will not leave the building.

Buyers ask for clear IP handling controls: who can access files, how data is stored, and how disclosure is logged. This is the minimum bar for supplier trust.

The Trap

The trap is assuming an NDA is enough. Real buyers want operational controls: who can access files, how they are stored, and how outputs are segmented.

The Geppetto Take

We run IP like a controlled asset. Access is role-based, files are watermarked, and sensitive assemblies are split so no single vendor sees the full design.

Evidence / Data

  • Most IP incidents come from internal process gaps, not external hacks.
  • Segmentation and access logging reduce exposure without slowing production.

Control Actions

  • Enforce role-based access to CAD and drawings.
  • Watermark PDFs and track revision downloads.
  • Segment assemblies across suppliers when risk is high.
  • Require device-level encryption and restricted export.

Checklist

  • NDA in place with IP scope defined.
  • Access logs enabled for all file downloads.
  • Revision control locked to authorized roles.
  • Vendor segmentation plan documented.

What to Send

Send your IP classification, list of restricted features, and any redaction rules.

FAQ

Is an NDA enough to protect IP?

No. Buyers expect process controls beyond legal terms.

How do you prevent over-sharing?

We segment assemblies and restrict access by role and job scope.

Can you work from redacted drawings?

Yes, if the redaction keeps critical interfaces and tolerances intact.

CTA

Send a screenshot for a chaos-check.